Why Demographics Matter More than Anything to the Future of the World - and Your Business

Media_httpwwwstrategy_pxcvz

This article in strategy+business covers an important, yet still highly underappreciated, trend whose ramifications will shape the world for the next half-century, and that is the shift in demographics, driving an aging population in the developed world and continued rapid population growth in the developing world. Far more than global warming, this trend has the potential to destabilize existing economies and upset the "world order," with all the potential chaos and, far too likely, violence that such change portends.

You can't fight demographics, and the figures that will shape the next 50 years have already been established. Japan, Europe, and (to a lesser extent - only because of higher immigration) the US will see an aging population, creating huge burdens on government coffers and the younger workers who will be expected to provide the tax revenue. This has been discussed for years but, since the consequences are still many years out and the elderly form such a powerful consumption and voting block, it is difficult to formulate a strategy to respond.

The interviewees discuss a range of ideas but only a few touch on the need to provide incentives to change behaviors. It is only through firm incentives that people, businesses, and government will change their everyday choices. Some practical (if admittedly difficult) ideas offered include:

• Delaying benefits from social insurance to encourage people to work later in life
• Encouraging retirees to move to lower cost-of-living regions to stretch the impact of their retirement benefits (though encouraging them to leave the country sounds a bit harsh)
• Using tax incentives to encourage larger families (to increase the future working population)
• Loosening up immigration policies
• Improving (perhaps subsidizing) child care coverage to encourage women to remain in the workforce
• Providing credits to encourage the hiring of older workers (where the alternative may be offshoring, where there are insufficient younger workers fill the necessary jobs)

And if you think that sounds challenging for the developed world, consider the challenges of developing economies, whose resources are, in many cases, insufficient to support their existing population. Some of the statistics shared are frightening:

• The population of Yemen will more than double from 17M to 39M people by 2020.
• Pakistan will add one-half the current population of Germany, or 38M people, over the next decade.

In such countries that already fight to maintain stability (and, in Yemen's case, lose), the potential for unrest is enormous. It is only by eventually moving beyond China and India and finding opportunities in Africa and the Middle East (which will represent over 20% of global population by 2050) that we can hope to provide an environment in which such countries can grow without violent disruption. This is not an altruistic wish, and it is my hope that the necessity of finding new markets will drive businesses and governments to focus their future efforts on Africa.

Filed under  //  business   demographics   economics   government   politics   strategy  
Comments (2)
Posted

How Bankers Think (an example from their Congressional testimony)

Media_httpwwwritholtz_zrqcq

This seems about right. Fully consistent with their expressions. And given their audience, I can only partially disagree with their sentiments. Just a warning though - I suspect Rick Wagoner had similar thoughts, so just be sure you are not in the government grasps before letting your thoughts dictate your behaviors or body language.

Filed under  //  finance   government   humor  
Comments (0)
Posted

Why it's not really US consumers who are the most "addicted to oil".

Media_httpwwwbusiness_atoyi

The most telling graphic on this chart is a comparison of US government (state and federal) tax revenues from gasoline versus oil industry profits. So, who is really the glutton in this equation?

That being said, and with me being a believer in the power of low tax rates, if you really want to reduce consumers' cravings for oil, it should be taxed even more (and such taxes should replace other, more anti-growth, taxes such as the extremely progressive income tax).

Filed under  //  economics   government   statistics  
Comments (2)
Posted

US BLS job growth outlook. Hottest industries list includes no mention of alternative energy.

(download)

Steve Tobak, on The Corner Office blog on BNET, picked up an an interesting publication from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on job outlooks from 2008 - 2018.  It includes forecasts, as shown above, of the industries with the largest job growth and largest job declines.  There are several surprises on this list worth mentioning, with the obvious caveat that this is strictly one forecast and, as you can always say about forecasts, the only thing that is certain is that it is wrong.

First, Steve points out that, for all the hype over alternative energy and the schemes being devised to create "green jobs", the industry does not appear on the lists with the best outlooks.  I do believe we will see a bubble in alternative energy as too many firms chase too small of a reality, and 10 years may just be long enough for this to play out fully. However, Steve also does point out that gas station jobs are predicted to decline; without much productivity really possible in that industry, the only implication one can read into this is reduced demand for gasoline.

It is also interesting that semiconductor manufacturing has the second worst outlook.  On one hand, this is a highly productivity-driven industry where increasing wafer sizes (and I make no prediction as to whether 400 or 450mm wafers are on the horizon, as its not a field I have kept up with recently) do rapidly increase throughput without increasing employment. This may also imply greater movement of the more advanced chip types that are still produced in the US abroad.

But what should concern us the most about this list is that nowhere in the top 10 growth industries is manufacturing represented.  The US cannot afford to become ever more reliant on services as only manufacturing (and agriculture and mining) actually create wealth, as this editorial in Manufacturing Engineering correctly points out.  The US is still the largest manufacturer in the world, and a weak dollar creates an environment where manufacturing can grow, so we must take advantage of this opportunity with smart industrial policy to promote the right types of industrial investment to create the high-value jobs of the future.

Filed under  //  economics   employment   government   manufacturing  
Comments (0)
Posted