China's Currency Adjustments are Just the First Step on a Long Rebalancing Path

(download)
This article on McKinsey Quarterly (free registration required to view the enitre article) makes some sound arguments as to why the risk of tumult during the upcoming global rebalancing process is high, and what companies can and should do to prepare.  The author feels that severe currency adjustments are possible, maybe even likely, as China begins to give some grounds on its peg to the dollar, for two reasons:

  • Unemployment may be more structural than cyclical now - this may force governements to allow their currency to weaken further (intentonally or accidentally) to provide advantages to exporters and try to drive employment growth
  • Existing exchange rates are suppressing the appropriate signals and incentives in commodity markets - at today's rates, commodities are underpriced in developed economies and overpriced in developing ones, thus encouraging overuse in the former and insufficient use in the latter.  Natural tendencies will be for this to reverse, especially as domestic demand grows in developing economies.

The recommendations for company executives are as follows:

  • Don't assume today's global realities (specifically, low cost labor in developing economies) will continue, and begin looking at alternate scenarios and developing responses in advance.
  • Err on the side of being prepared for these risks to occur - be overliquid and overcapitalized
  • Do scenario planning around unthinkables - such as $300 oil, a 30% shift in exchange rates in a rapid period, etc.  Since the last financial crisis was (at least) partly driven by commodity price surges, such scenarios are no longer unrealistic.
  • Stop thinking that "some day" developing economies will have sufficient local demand, and start acting as if they already do - treat China as your "second home"

Filed under  //  currency   economics   employment   globalization   strategy  
Comments (0)
Posted

Employment Future: The Decade Ahead In Jobs

Here is a more interesting version of some data I've shared before regarding future trends in employment by sector. Surprisingly, according to this prediction its not health care that has the brightest prospects but rather "professional and business services." Regrettably, manufacturing still has the weakest outlook, not good news for the stability and general health of the US economy.

Filed under  //  economics   employment   infographic  
Comments (0)
Posted

The State of Unemployment in the US. Figures Still Very Grim

Media_httpwwwbusiness_pwlpd

This chart summarizes a lot of statistics regarding US unemployment (but it still understates true unemployment as it doesn't count discouraged job seekers who have stopped looking for a job or those who are underemployed. It is going to be a long road back to more reasonable unemployment levels or even (don't say it too loudly) *full employment*.

Filed under  //  economics   employment   infographic   statistics  
Comments (0)
Posted

US BLS job growth outlook. Hottest industries list includes no mention of alternative energy.

(download)

Steve Tobak, on The Corner Office blog on BNET, picked up an an interesting publication from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on job outlooks from 2008 - 2018.  It includes forecasts, as shown above, of the industries with the largest job growth and largest job declines.  There are several surprises on this list worth mentioning, with the obvious caveat that this is strictly one forecast and, as you can always say about forecasts, the only thing that is certain is that it is wrong.

First, Steve points out that, for all the hype over alternative energy and the schemes being devised to create "green jobs", the industry does not appear on the lists with the best outlooks.  I do believe we will see a bubble in alternative energy as too many firms chase too small of a reality, and 10 years may just be long enough for this to play out fully. However, Steve also does point out that gas station jobs are predicted to decline; without much productivity really possible in that industry, the only implication one can read into this is reduced demand for gasoline.

It is also interesting that semiconductor manufacturing has the second worst outlook.  On one hand, this is a highly productivity-driven industry where increasing wafer sizes (and I make no prediction as to whether 400 or 450mm wafers are on the horizon, as its not a field I have kept up with recently) do rapidly increase throughput without increasing employment. This may also imply greater movement of the more advanced chip types that are still produced in the US abroad.

But what should concern us the most about this list is that nowhere in the top 10 growth industries is manufacturing represented.  The US cannot afford to become ever more reliant on services as only manufacturing (and agriculture and mining) actually create wealth, as this editorial in Manufacturing Engineering correctly points out.  The US is still the largest manufacturer in the world, and a weak dollar creates an environment where manufacturing can grow, so we must take advantage of this opportunity with smart industrial policy to promote the right types of industrial investment to create the high-value jobs of the future.

Filed under  //  economics   employment   government   manufacturing  
Comments (0)
Posted